2MC or not 2MC

Should your church plant be a Missional Community model or a traditional model?  That is the question these days isn’t it?  And it is a question that people find increasingly difficult to answer.  I must say that in the first buzz of my own MC or not MC questions about seven or so years ago the answer was obvious: MC all the way!  Now?  Well I am still a fan of MCs, but have tempered some of my original sycophancy with a good dose of realism.

At the outset let me say that I do not care what model of church plant you do. The only question I am concerned with is this: Is your model making and growing disciples of Jesus?  In the past I have met an MC church that has had the same 20 people for over ten years. No additions!  The community bit was working ok, but missional had dropped off the radar. At the same time if you are planting a traditional church then I believe that you have to have a clear evangelism strategy that has a focus on an unreached suburb or people group.  To simply plant because your area lacks a Bible teaching church is not enough.  It may well be true, but your goal is to reach people for Jesus, not to plant a Bible teaching church.  You should do both, but you should not be doing the latter without being completely committed – in visible, practical ways – to the former.

Now with all that said, here are three of the most fertile conditions for a successful MC model of church plant:

1. Leave and Cleave. Yes, that’s right.  MC churches are like a marriage.  If you are going to be involved in the core group of an MC you have some painful decisions to make.  The most painful is that the core must loosen the cords of any relationship that does not intersect with at least one other relationship held by a member/family of the core (especially relationships in their old churches).  Why is this the case? Two reasons: Firstly because I have noticed that the healthiest MC churches decide to focus on specific relationships together – and often new specific relationships.  We only have so much time in the day/week/year.  If the long-term, low key, relational strategy is ever going to work it can only work if the relationship network is “thick”.  The very occasional catch up with a core group’s friend who you never see otherwise is not what MC life is about.  It is about spending a lot of time with the same people over a long period of time.  Such a way of life cuts against the grain of our busy, rush-around culture, in which we touch base briefly and infrequently with many relationships.  If you and your core group are willing to leave and cleave then MC may be right for you. But secondly, if you cannot resist the siren call of your old friendship groups then you will never have the emotional time and energy to invest in new ones.  We are not God – someone will have to be jettisoned at some stage, especially if the plant starts to grow, and if it is too painful to leave those old relationships behind, then an MC plant is not for you.

2. Flexible Lifestyles. When MCs fail or falter it is often at this point; peoples’ lives are simply not flexible enough to accommodate the model.  Here is my cold, clear-eyed observation: We are far more willing to change our church model for the sake of evangelism than we are to change our lifestyles for the sake of evangelism.  MC models tend to work best with people who are able and willing to make big changes to their lives – not simply big changes to their churches.  Sadly, as we are finding out, if you have a couple of kids, a sick or ailing parent/s, a job in the city, a partner with a part-time job and a fairly biggish mortgage then your lifestyle will preclude you from an effective ministry in an MC model.  This generally means that for middle Australia, the MC model is out.  That means two things:  Firstly, cheer up! You are not justified by your model of church, you are justified by Jesus and his saving work on the cross.  But secondly, sober up!  Our lives as God’s people are way too busy and we come up with all sorts of reasons why we have to be involved in the plethora of activities/social events/ functions/jobs/school and sporting events that we are.  I do believe that there has to be a discernible difference between the pace of life of the believer and the pace of the life of the unbeliever – yet there doesn’t seem to be!  Wasn’t it Jesus who said that the pagans “run after all these things”, yet we don’t look like we’re running much slower, in fact  church activities are now additions, rather than replacements, in this sprint to the finish line.  For some of us – many of us actually – the merry-go-round (mixing your metaphors? – Ed) is simply going too fast to jump off without causing some pain.

At this point the charge is often made that the many demanding vocations that we are involved in are good and noble tasks, and that we should not bifurcate “church” ministry from the rest of life ministry.  True – all true.  However, it’s not the work/vocation that generally drains us, but the lifestyle that accompanies it.  You know what I mean: the right suburbs/the right schools/the social activities/the schools to send your children to/the activities regarded as those your children should undertake in order to have the best chance of achievement. It’s a subtle pull, and dangerous.  But don’t take a Westerner’s viewpoint on this, ask a Christian from the Third World how they see our lifestyles and what the dangers might be.  Probably the same as theirs: syncretism.  “Lifestyle” is a dangerous god because it blends our necessary activities with those that we could jettison until we can no longer tell the difference.

I sound like I am speaking to middle class, well educated people here. I am, because that, primarily, is what evangelicalism is in Australia.  Vast swathes of lower socio-economic and working class areas are completely churchless.

A Common Goal. It sounds obvious that people who join an MC model of church have a common goal, right?  Wrong!  How do I know?  Because I naively assumed that those who joined a (now failed) plant I led had a common goal.  And they all thought they did at the start too, or at least they so wanted to join that they told me they did.  It was only after a period of time, when the cracks started to appear, that I realised that evangelising the lost was not the primary goal of some who joined. I say “primary” because it was in there somewhere, just not integral.  It became clear that one couple had joined because they liked small church, whilst another family were just a bit more funky than the average evangelical church in my neck of the woods could cater for.  But what was most telling was that several of these couples had felt burned or burnt out by churches.  Now this is a real phenomenon, and one that needs to be addressed, but joining an MC church group whose goal is evangelism and mission is not the solution. The result is often a group in need of deep pastoral care, and who are suffering from shell-shock.  Sending them to the front line didn’t seem to be an option, nor did they want to go.  Ironically, my experience of the MC model in the UK showed me that evangelising the lost can be the solution to this burn-out or pain from past church experiences, but no MC will function well when too many of its people are emotionally or spiritually worn out at the start up.

Well, that’s a start. I am working on other aspects of this and will post them over time – including a reflection on the type of people best reached by either model.  I am a big advocate of the MC model, and am currently in a plant that operates both models, so I cover all bases! However we need to be clear and honest as we go into this process. The MC model is a great one, but we cannot and should not universalise it, nor view it as the solution to the evangelism of Australia (just as we don’t view solid Bible teaching churches as the solution – cos there are plenty of them too, and we’re still not keeping pace with population growth).

7 Comments

  1. Yeah I’m with you mate.

    Make disciples, reach people who don’t know Jesus and do it however you like. Just do it.

    The lifestyle challenge is a bugger though because its not just Christians who are busy – trying to catch people in your community can be equally difficult as they are often living obscenely busy lives.

    So the Christian can slow down and find he has lots of time alone! (Which some of us may not mind)

    So I find myself still perplexed by evangelistic strategies in Oz today and wondering just what the answers are – or if we even want to hear them.

    I sense something more costly is required of all of us, but no one wants to go first only to discover they have gone alone… I’m not sure what looks like even but it’s one my hunches

  2. Food for thought and I certainly agree with many of your points, but I wonder if perhaps your definition of missional is too narrow. Too focussed on getting them through the door salvation – I’m being perhaps a bit provocative with my words there, as I don’t think that is how you mean it. Jesus came to usher in the kingdom and I think we really have to re-envision what that actually means for people today. Kingdom living isn’t just about sitting around a table developing deep relationships over a meal, it is about bringing wholeness to the world around us, including creation. Redemption starts at Genesis and weaves its way through to the cross and beyond. How do we bring that into our lives and live that out? What does a missional community look like, not just caring for souls but for the land, for the people in their entirety, for whole communities. It might not just mean sowing into individual people, but into our communities in many different ways, bringing light, bringing truth, bringing justice, bringing encouragement – especially to the people of peace, whoever they are. Most of all I think we need to ask ourselves how do we release the people of God to be what they are meant to be in the community and not just following a single vision.

    1. Hi Joanna
      Yep I think the KOG is all that and more, tho not less than the proclamation of the word too. I don’t think we can usher it in ourselves – that’s the King of the Kingdom’s job, but we can in small (and large?) ways model what God wants, all in the power of the Spirit. And I certainly wouldn’t want to corral people into a uniformity, as opposed to unity. Perhaps my urgency comes from the desperate need to proclaim that the King himself is one day coming to put everything right, and that means he is coming down our street too, and unless we have been put right by him through faith the coming king is coming as judge. I have become more urgent about evangelism over the years simply because I see how broken people are and how desperately they need the good news, not just good people. But as ever Joanna, I appreciate your wise reflections on my spiky remarks, a wisdom your daughter seems to emulate.

      1. Lol, glad she is stirring up the Kingdom her end as well then 🙂

        I can understand your urgency as the times are changing and significant events are taking place. We have glimpses of it in one crises after another, as God graciously calls all people to account. I believe he is already putting things right, the very fact that so much is being revealed that was once hidden, I think is evidence of that. The Kingdom is near at hand, so close and so yes the times are urgent, especially for those with an evangelistic heart. And yet! If there is one thing you learn in a country that is still changing and finding its feet in the world, or after moving countries so many times, sometimes you just have to take your time. God has all the time in the world, our running around frantically won’t make that any different, so it is interesting what you and thereticcontrolboxman has to say about making time.

        Taking time out to reflect and mull may seem counterintuitive and maddening to people used to life in the fast lane, but sometimes very necessary. Maybe some folks need to grow some vegetables, to understand God’s timings. :). Look forward to discussing more things in April if you are around and have time 🙂

  3. of course Joanna – any good reason for you coming to Oz? 😉
    I guess I haven’t found as much time this past few months for reflection with a few sicknesses in family etc, but perhaps I should grow vegetables! My fear is that I will one day become one! In reality, in the past three years I have slowed down the pace of life a lot, a lesson from being quite sick and then incapacitated after surgery. God taught me a lot in the down time

    1. Think there maybe an important event coming up 😉

      Well I have been growing vegetables for 20 odd years and I don’t think I’ve turned into one yet. Maybe a bit odd if you ask our kids but not a vegetable anyway. It is amazing though, how many people learn from down times that are enforced. My prayer is that people will choose that path, rather than having it forced on them. I will face quite a challenge when it comes to getting back into my studies again, but down time and growing vegetables will have to be a part of that or I too will crash.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s