When You’re Not On the Same Page, But In The Same Book

I entreat Euodia and I entreat Syntyche to agree in the Lord…whose names are in the book of life. (Phil 4)

The turn of politics in the West clearly shows that that Christians who aren’t on the same page politically better recognise they’re in the same book. If they don’t then there’s a shameful schism coming to the church that will expose how in thrall we are to earthly politics as our true hope.


If my Facebook page is telling me anything these past days (indeed the past six to twelve months), it’s this: Many Christians are dangerously close to aping the partisanship of the world when it comes to how they view those who disagree with them politically.

The age of respectful discourse is pretty much over in the public political square. That much seems clear.  And it won’t be coming back any time soon.  That too is clear.  Where it bottoms out we can’t tell, but at the moment the aim of the game seems to be to see how one can despise and scorn those who hold opposing views.

And Christians, in line with other cultural drifts, are heading right over that precipice not simply in their engagement with the secular world, but with fellow believers.

Don’t believe me?  Then if you’re a Christian posting anti-Trump messages on Facebook, how do you feel about those Christians who are glad he’s President because he going to slow down the gleeful shut down of the Christian voice by a liberal agenda? Or because Clinton’s views on abortion negate the idea that all human life is sacred?

And if you’re a Christian posting pro-Trump messages on Facebook, how do you feel about those Christian women who are marching against him because of his dreadful moral character and sexually degrading statements? Or because Trump’s view on immigrants is dog-whistling?

And what if those people were in the same church?  Well, we can sort that out can’t we? We can change churches until we find one that’s reflective of all our political persuasions.  Just like Paul told opposing factions to do – Jew (weak) and Gentile (strong), in Romans, or perhaps even to the two ladies quoted in Philippians 4 who are at each others’ throats; Euodia and Syntyche.

Except he didn’t.  He wouldn’t.  He can’t.  Not because he can’t, but because the gospel  of King Jesus won’t let him. The gospel that brought an end to the enmity between God and humanity brought, as a byproduct, an end to the enmity between humanity and humanity. Pure and simple.

So I love how Paul acknowledges the conflict of these two women, but then at the end of that section points to the fact that they, along with others, while not on the same page, are in the same book, the book of life.  There’s something bigger at stake here than their partisanship over their much cherished issue.

If you’re in my homeland Australia reading this, then pay attention, because that’s the polarising political tsunami headed in our direction as well.  As usual Australia gets everything last.  So perhaps we could learn a lesson early before it reaches our shores.  Or perhaps we won’t learn that lesson, as I fear we won’t.

And what is that lesson?  It’s this: If the church is to be any sort of counter-cultural movement, if it is to have any effective witness to a watching, suspicious world, it better be able to model what it means to love someone who vehemently disagrees with you on a whole range of cultural and political matters.

 Because increasingly no one else does.  Increasingly no one else can tolerate a person who holds a polar opposite viewpoint to them on something – anything.  All sorts of subhuman name-calling can be justified.  Watch the news/op-ed shows.  Read the comments below the line in the papers.  The dark, scornful evil heart of humanity is there for all to see.

Yet the fact is that one day the Lord Jesus will return to judge the earth in righteousness and truth (His righteousness and His truth), and will simply blow away the proud leaders of this age.

That should at least give us pause for thought, a space for humility, and a concern that we be found ready for that appearing by agreeing in the Lord simply because, while not on the same page, we are in the same book.  And we’re in that book not because we’re progressive; not because we’re conservative; but because we are sinners saved by the grace of God.



  1. Maybe the local church should be the safe space to “practice” respectful discourse about a range ideas that might be associated with divergent ideas; but the presenters not threatened by expulsion or exclusion 🙂

  2. So how would you handle an individual who constantly espouses the benefits of socialism/communism in a multigenerational Sunday School class, seeking to twist various Scriptures into validation of his philosophical/political viewpoints? A class where the teacher does not refute the errors in this individuals exegeting of Scripture.
    I think that there are times when you have to call a spade a spade. Even Paul called out those in error that were in the church, in a manner that might not be considered tactful (IE. the grievous sin in Corinth and the church allowing it to go on). Even Jesus confronted those misusing the temple of God by turning over tables and whipping them (no I’m not considering this).
    My concern is that the teacher is not even refuting the lies of this godless philosopy that has resulted in the deaths of countless millions and allows this individual to ramble on for several minutes almost every Sunday School meeting.
    Two Sunday’s ago I had had enough and informed the individual that he was wrong, pointing out errors in what he had mentioned. And lo and behold this past Sunday he remained silent.
    As the quote attributed to Edmund Burke state’s “The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to say nothing.”
    I also think of the confessing church in Nazi Germany and can’t help but wonder if more Christian’s had stood up as Bonhoeffer and Niebuhr had, would things have been different?

    1. That sounds less about the individual and more about the teacher. If the person who holds those views is not the teacher then that doesn’t seem to be a problem. But FWIW any political system – including modern Western democracy – can be just as godless, and is proving to be so. Perhaps you’re better off taking it to the person privately, but at the same time saying “you are wrong” on a matter such as politics, seems to be a big call. Theological heresy I can see, but political persuasions can be tricky.

  3. This reminds me of family….round the table questions and conversation, robust, passionate and downright terrifying as these young ones find their way wrestling and expressing all sorts of ideas. We never shut it down, name called or discouraged it because we LOVE….maybe if we all gaze into the eyes of Love and fire more often and focus on worship of the Living God, we could set each other free to be wherever we are along the road and have a laugh as we journey together.

    Sent from my iPad


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.